Posts Tagged ‘Personal Injury’

Why I Love Being a Personal Injury Lawyer- Part 7

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Personal injury lawyers should always think from the client’s perspective. When making decisions about how to handle a case, whether to settle or whether to litigate, whether to enter settlement negotiations early or late, whether to order an independent medical examination or recommend that my client seek a second medical opinion, my duty as a personal injury lawyer is to put the interests of my client first. I love this about being a personal injury lawyer, because it takes my ego out of the equation and allows me to seek justice for the client, whatever that means from the client’s perspective. By focusing on my client’s interests, I can tailor my negotiations and my litigation strategy to suit my client’s needs. Whenever I am at a sticking point and having a difficult time making a decision, I can revert back to the most important question, “How can I serve my client’s best interest.” Every day I remind myself that this business is not about me. It is about the client. Knowing and remembering this guides my practice and reduces a ton of internal conflict that could arise if my client and I had dueling interests. Let’s say, for example, my client wants to settle her case, but I think we could get more out of a jury trial. I explain to my client my belief that we could do better at trial, but the client wants to settle anyway. This situation produces no conflict for me or for any good personal injury attorney, because we know that the motivating force behind all of our decisions is the will of our clients. If we feel strongly that our client is making a mistake by settling, we have a duty to express that opinion and to try to persuade our client to make a wiser decision. However, if the client still wants to settle after being fully informed, we settle the case. Our job is done, and we did it well, because we put the client’s interests before our own. I love that about being a personal injury lawyer.

Why I Love Being a Personal Injury Lawyer- Part 5

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

In Tallahassee, personal injury lawyers abound. Every phone book has a personal injury lawyer on the back and a personal injury law firm’s magnetic advertisement on the front. Despite the abundance of lawyers and the obvious competition between them, I have found that other personal injury lawyers from other Tallahassee law firms are extremely supportive of each other. Most of us believe in a common goal of helping our clients through difficult times. We all believe that what we do is important for the nation as a whole, and that whenever one of us succeeds against an insurance company or big business, everybody wins. As the hosts of a television show called Law Call here in Tallahassee, my firm had the privilege of inviting onto the show another highly respected personal injury attorney in town. Despite the fact that there is friendly competition between our firms, this attorney joined forces with us to educate the public about personal injury law and the jury system, the importance of maintaining uninsured motorist coverage, and other extremely important facts that people should consider when driving a vehicle. I never have a problem calling a local attorney for advice on how to handle a case. And I show my support to other attorneys who are litigating a case or need some advice. The attorneys in Tallahassee seem to be able to put aside business differences and reach for a common goal of helping injured people. I love that about being a Tallahassee personal injury lawyer.

How to Negotiate a Personal Injury Settlement- Part 6

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

You have followed all of the first five steps and negotiations seem to have failed. You have written a letter regarding the severity of the injuries to the defense adjuster long before treatment was completed. Once the plaintiff reached maximum medical improvement, you wrote a demand letter to the adjuster and submitted it along with supporting documentation. You obtained the first offer from the adjuster along with the adjuster’s anticipated defenses. You decided upon a reasonable settlement value. You tested the adjusters’ resolve by asking for a better offer. You made counter offers utilizing the bracketing technique, and decreased your demand to the same extent that the adjuster increased his offer. The adjuster stopped increasing his offers and told you at least three times that his last offer was a final offer. Yet the adjuster still hasn’t offered to pay what you and your client decided to be a reasonable settlement offer.

Your choices appear to be twofold: you can either settle the case for less than you think it’s worth, or you can file a lawsuit and take the defendant to court. At this point, it is important that you don’t settle the case. I never settle a case for less than I think it’s worth unless my client instructs. And I never file a lawsuit until I’m convinced there is no way to convince the adjuster to pay what the case is worth. When negotiations appear to have reached an impasse, I do the following:

1. I obtain additional documentation to support the claim and ask the adjuster for a better offer. This additional documentation might come in the form of medical opinions, before/after witness statements (witnesses who can testify abouty my client’s injuries after the accident as compared to his or her physical condition before the accident), additional documentation to solidify the lost wages claim, additional documentation to support the mileage claim, additional documentation regarding the cost of future medical treatment, etc.. If this elicits a better offer, I then reinstate the bracketing procedure until we settle the case or reach another impasse. At this point, I like to start negotiating with the adjuster via fax or e-mail as opposed to over the phone. The adjustser has already told me that she will not pay a penny more on the case. By submitting the additional documentation along with a letter, it makes it easier for the adjuster to answer in writing, saving herself the embarrassment of acknowledging over the phone that her previous threat of a “final offer” was actually a bluff. It’s good to send this additional documentation little by little as opposed to all at once, because each time you send additional documentation you may receive an increased offer, and you can reinitiate the bracketing procedure.

2. I do jury verdict research and submit it to the adjuster. Westlaw has a jury verdict research function that allows me to look through cases which have previously been decided by a jury to find a case comparable to the one I am negotiating. If I can find some cases similar to the one I am negotiating but with verdicts higher than the defendant’s last offer, I submit them to the defendant’s adjuster and ask for a better offer. If this elicits a better offer, I reinitiate the bracketing procedure until the case settles or we reach another impasse.

3. If neither additional documentation nor jury verdict research get the case settled, I then prepare a complaint and discovery and send it to the defendant’s insurance adjuster, asking once again for a better offer and explaining that I will file the complaint and discovery if a better offer is not forthcoming. I indicate that my client is willing to continue negotiations if the defendant will increase the offer. If this elicits a better offer, I then reinitiate the bracketing procedure until the case settles.

4. If the case doesn’t settle, I file a lawsuit and prepare for trial. It’s important to be willing to walk away from a settlement if you don’t think it’s fair. Once I file a lawsuit, I send a letter to the adjuster saying that negotiations have failed, all settlement offers are off the table, and the cost of settling the case will increase with the amount of money I put into it.